distinction between Euroresus and chivere in the public notice admission to the mucenta.
5.
The question was fully Discussed at the Legislative Council on the 10th.
Copies of debate in Legislative Council attended. Chief Justice's letter to me were laid before the Legislative Council.
When the Estimates were wed, and M. Terwick was unable to get a single increaser of his the ease.
The only member who was absent from that meeting, the Chief Justice, has written to the Colonial Secretary to express his concurrence in the views publicized at the Council Table by the two unofficial Members, Mr. Styric and I. Sta hoy.
Mr. Reypis had said "He saw no reason why the same Prolification should not be put up in the Library. In principle, he had the same objection to any distinction being drawn.
Mr. Sty. Choy, had said "There was no valid accuse for drawing the distinction in the Museum notice. It had been said that the Chinese had never objected to the notice. But that was not true, because the Chinese did complain about it.
If reference were made to the Chinese newspapers, it would be seen that articles had been written bitterly complaining of this
Dec.
distinction between Euroresus and
chivere in the public notice
admission to the mucenta.
5.
The question was
F
fully Discuped
at the Legislative Council on the 10th 7.
Copies of debate in Législative, Council atender. Chief Justice's letter to me dreamente laid labe Lepilation Connel.
Lertember when the Estimates were
wed, and M. Terwick was unable
to get a single incrater of his
the ease.
was
view
The only member who
absent from that meeting
the
Thiet Eustice fir She brake, has
written to the Colonish becutary to
expres
مشاد
ritated
concurrence in the views
publicitat the Council Table by the two unofficial Members Mr. Styric and I. Sta hoy. Mr. Reypis had said
M
1
LE
$
K
"
น
He saw no reason
why the
Jame
Prolification should not be put up
13
was in the Library. In princisée
he had the same Ljection
"Excellency to any
drawn.
"There
As
Fis
ان
distinction being
Mr. Sty. Choy, had said I
no valid accuse for
was wo
drawing the distinction in the
Museum notice. It had been said
A
that the Chinese had
never objecten
AL
was ure
to the notice. But that was
true, because the chinese dish comptan
about it. of
of reference were made
to the Chinese newspapers it would
be seen that articles had been
writter bitterly complaining of this
Dec.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.